article urlPilot union tells members to stop using non-inclusive words like “cockpit” as safety takes backseat
Wed Jun 19 2024
MXM Exclusive

Quick Hit: 

The Air Line Pilots Association International (ALPA), the largest pilots' union globally, has suggested phasing out the word "cockpit" in favor of more inclusive terminology. This recommendation is part of a broader push towards diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) within the aviation industry.

Key Details: 

  • ALPA made the suggestion in its 2021 "Inclusive Language Reference Guide."
  • The call for change comes amid ongoing safety issues and DEI initiatives at major aviation companies like Boeing.
  • The recommendation has sparked debate on prioritizing language changes over pressing industry concerns.

Diving Deeper: 

The Air Line Pilots Association International (ALPA) has recently called for the aviation industry to phase out the term "cockpit," deeming it insufficiently inclusive. This proposal is part of the union's 2021 "Inclusive Language Reference Guide," which aims to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) across the industry. ALPA's suggestion to replace "cockpit" with more neutral terms like "flight deck" has sparked a significant conversation among aviation professionals and the general public.

The union's push for inclusive language comes at a time when major aviation companies, notably Boeing, have faced severe safety challenges. Boeing has been under intense scrutiny following a series of safety failures, including the grounding of the 737 Max after two fatal crashes. Critics argue that the focus on DEI initiatives, such as language changes, may divert attention from addressing critical safety and operational issues.

ALPA's emphasis on inclusivity follows a broader trend within the aviation sector to promote a more diverse and welcoming environment. However, this move has not been without controversy. Detractors argue that while promoting inclusivity is important, it should not overshadow the industry's paramount responsibility to ensure passenger safety and operational integrity.

Proponents of the language change argue that updating terminology is a step toward making the aviation field more welcoming to all genders and backgrounds. They believe that small changes in language can have a broader impact on cultural perceptions and inclusivity within the industry. On the other hand, opponents see this as a distraction from more pressing issues, such as improving safety standards and addressing technical deficiencies that have plagued the sector.

The debate over the term "cockpit" reflects a larger conversation about the balance between DEI initiatives and operational priorities. While inclusivity is a commendable goal, it must be pursued alongside, not at the expense of, rigorous safety and performance standards.

Log In or Sign Up to get news that’s the most relevant to you.
Other Recent Articles