Quick Hit:
ABC News moderators fact-checked former President Donald Trump at least seven times during a debate but failed to fact-check Vice President Kamala Harris even once, raising questions of media bias.
Key Details:
Diving Deeper:
During a recent presidential debate moderated by ABC News’ Linsey Davis and David Muir, former President Donald Trump faced at least seven fact-checks, while Vice President Kamala Harris received none, highlighting a stark disparity in treatment. According to the ABC News transcript, the moderators repeatedly interrupted Trump to "clarify" his statements but allowed Harris’s comments to go unchecked, despite several dubious claims.
Among the most glaring examples of bias was Harris’s mention of the widely debunked Charlottesville "very fine people" hoax. The claim falsely suggests Trump praised white supremacists during the 2017 rally. Despite this, neither Davis nor Muir challenged Harris. The absence of scrutiny starkly contrasted with how Trump was treated. Several of his remarks—on crime rates, immigration, and the 2020 election—were fact-checked in real-time.
For instance, Muir interrupted Trump to assert that violent crime was decreasing nationally, citing the FBI, even though recent data shows rising crime in many major cities. Similarly, a fact-check concerning Springfield, Ohio, where Trump alleged pet harm by immigrants, was called into question despite existing anecdotal reports supporting Trump’s claim.
Fact checks for Trump:
This one-sided fact-checking approach has led to widespread criticism. As Trump faced immediate rebuttals for his statements, Harris’s remarks, some of which have been labeled false or misleading by independent outlets, went unchallenged.