Quick Hit:
Election analyst Nate Silver has boosted Donald Trump's probability of winning the 2024 election, citing momentum shifts in the latest polls. Trump now holds a significant lead over Kamala Harris.
Key Details:
- Nate Silver’s model gives Trump a 63.8% probability of victory against Kamala Harris.
- Trump's chances have increased nearly 5 points since Thursday, with a rise from 58.2%.
- A new poll shows Trump favored in key swing states like Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Arizona.
Diving Deeper:
Election analyst Nate Silver has sharply raised Donald Trump’s chances of winning the 2024 presidential election, giving him a 63.8% probability of defeating Vice President Kamala Harris. This uptick comes in the wake of a New York Times/Sienna poll released Sunday, which Silver cites as highly reliable. The poll, along with other indicators, prompted Silver to increase Trump's odds from 58.2% just days earlier.
Silver’s model now shows Trump with a strong advantage in several crucial swing states. Trump is given a 64% chance of winning Pennsylvania, 54% for Michigan, and 53% for Wisconsin. In traditionally conservative-leaning states like Arizona (77%), North Carolina (75%), and Georgia (68%), Trump holds even firmer ground. Harris, by comparison, faces an uphill battle as her support appears to erode.
The increase in Trump’s probability highlights the challenges Harris faces, particularly as perceptions of her being "too progressive" take root. A significant portion of voters, 47%, believe Harris leans too far left, according to the poll, compared to 32% who say Trump is too conservative. Silver pointed out in his Substack post that Harris’s perceived ideological tilt could be a growing liability, especially as she attempts to appeal to centrist voters.
In his analysis, Silver noted that Harris’s struggle with media engagements and her shifting policy positions might be exacerbating her decline. He referenced her attempts to position herself as a centrist during recent speeches but suggested that her record of progressive advocacy could continue to hurt her campaign.