Quick Hit:

In a concerning legal twist, an Obama-era judge ruled to empower illegal immigrants with gun ownership rights, defying American legal traditions and prioritizing non-citizens over Americans.

Key Details:

Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman, an Obama appointee, struck down a law safeguarding Americans by barring illegal immigrants from gun ownership.
The ruling favored Heriberto Carbajal-Flores, an illegal alien charged with unlawful firearm possession.
This decision contradicts long-standing American legal principles, including historical restrictions on non-citizens’ Second Amendment rights.

Diving Deeper:

In a flagrant example of judicial activism, U.S. District Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman, an appointee of Barack Obama, undermined U.S. law by ruling against a federal statute that rightly prohibits illegal immigrants from possessing firearms. This audacious decision, issued on March 8, comes from the case of Heriberto Carbajal-Flores, an illegal alien who flagrantly violated U.S. laws by possessing a firearm.

Coleman's ruling is a blatant disregard for the Supreme Court’s guidelines and the Constitution’s intent. While relying on the New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen decision, she erroneously extended Second Amendment rights to an individual who has already broken U.S. laws by his illegal presence. This stands in stark opposition to the D.C. v. Heller decision, which clearly states that the Second Amendment’s protection is for law-abiding members of the political community – a status illegal aliens do not possess.

Historically, U.S. laws and court rulings have consistently maintained that non-citizens, particularly those illegally present, do not have the same rights as American citizens. This includes fundamental rights like bearing arms. Attorney Kostas Moros’s analysis aligns with this perspective, highlighting that illegal entry into the U.S. does not establish the requisite connection to the American national community.

This ruling not only conflicts with historical U.S. traditions but also poses a direct threat to American sovereignty and the rule of law. By equating the rights of illegal immigrants with those of American citizens, it undermines the very framework of our legal system, where citizenship and legal residency confer certain privileges and responsibilities.

Furthermore, this decision comes as part of a broader trend where liberal judges and Democratic policies increasingly favor non-citizens, often at the expense of American citizens' safety and legal rights. It reflects a dangerous precedence, setting the stage for further erosions of American law and the rights of its lawful citizens. The need for a strong conservative response to reaffirm American legal principles and uphold the integrity of our nation's laws has never been more urgent.